Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 2:29:05 GMT -5
Bodies and entities involved in the regulation of the National Financial System, competition defense, consumer protection, education, information technology, public service infrastructure (and its various segments), with the analysis of the most appropriate link not only to monitor and punish companies, but also to encourage innovation and reduce the burden imposed on economic activity.
Specifically in relation to information technology, it doesn't seem to make sense to me that we have agencies for public key infrastructure, data protection, virtual assets, cybersecurity and, later, artificial intelligence or, who knows, quantum computing, internet of things and so on. go. Each phenomenon has its specificities, but I think it is necessary to reflect on an institutional design capable of consolidating mechanisms to deal with general and specific risks.
What do you, who read this text, think? What are B2B Email List the difficulties and side effects of creating a general information technology agency, to regulate the use of services related to these technologies and the protection of users? To what extent is regulatory fragmentation harmful?
More brains, less heads. More synergy, less overlap and conflicts of competence.
Drex systematizes its operation based on digital assets and smart contracts, using a distributed ledger technology environment. In other words, it uses blockchain technology to ensure that a transaction is completed when all its conditions are met.
An example given in the video is the famous situation of buying a used car. The question always arises as to who should take the first step in the transaction: is it necessary to transfer the money first or transfer the documentation? The existence of this doubt brings uncertainty to the operation, which promises to be resolved by Drex.
In this sense, the law of obligations teaches about the need to define, among others, the order for the performance of payments. An example of this can be taken from articles 597 and 491, both of the Civil Code, which serve as guidelines so that, unless otherwise expressed by the parties, (1) the consideration for the provision of the service, if in cash, is made after the its delivery and also define that, (2) since the sale is not on credit, the seller is not obliged to deliver the thing before payment.
Specifically in relation to information technology, it doesn't seem to make sense to me that we have agencies for public key infrastructure, data protection, virtual assets, cybersecurity and, later, artificial intelligence or, who knows, quantum computing, internet of things and so on. go. Each phenomenon has its specificities, but I think it is necessary to reflect on an institutional design capable of consolidating mechanisms to deal with general and specific risks.
What do you, who read this text, think? What are B2B Email List the difficulties and side effects of creating a general information technology agency, to regulate the use of services related to these technologies and the protection of users? To what extent is regulatory fragmentation harmful?
More brains, less heads. More synergy, less overlap and conflicts of competence.
Drex systematizes its operation based on digital assets and smart contracts, using a distributed ledger technology environment. In other words, it uses blockchain technology to ensure that a transaction is completed when all its conditions are met.
An example given in the video is the famous situation of buying a used car. The question always arises as to who should take the first step in the transaction: is it necessary to transfer the money first or transfer the documentation? The existence of this doubt brings uncertainty to the operation, which promises to be resolved by Drex.
In this sense, the law of obligations teaches about the need to define, among others, the order for the performance of payments. An example of this can be taken from articles 597 and 491, both of the Civil Code, which serve as guidelines so that, unless otherwise expressed by the parties, (1) the consideration for the provision of the service, if in cash, is made after the its delivery and also define that, (2) since the sale is not on credit, the seller is not obliged to deliver the thing before payment.